MARATTO

article · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

THE EFFECT OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION AND CHEWING MINT GUM ON LABOR PAIN INTENSITY AND ANXIETY LEVEL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

Abstract Background: Non-pharmacological pain management strategies play an important role in reducing labor pain and anxiety during active phase of the first stage of labor. Aim: To compare the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and chewing mint gum on labor pain intensity and anxiety level. Design: A quasi-experimental design was utilized. Setting: The study was conducted in the labor unit at Badr Hospital Capital University, Cairo, Egypt. Sample: A purposive sample of 90 pregnant women was recruited. Tools: Data were collected using four tools: (I) a structured interview questionnaire, (II) standardized labor pain assessment, (III) Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; and (IV) Pregnant Women`s Satisfaction Level. Results: Most pregnant women’s reported severe pain before the intervention. After the interventions, TENS significantly reduced pain and anxiety compared to chewing mint gum. In the TENS group, 16.7% reported mild pain and 80% moderate pain, while 63.3% of the chewing mint gum group continued to experience severe pain. Anxiety improvement was 51.1% in the TENS group versus 20.4% in the chewing mint gum group. Pregnant women satisfaction was higher with TENS, with 80% reporting complete satisfaction compared to 36.7% in the chewing mint gum group. Conclusion: TENS was more effective than chewing mint gum in reducing labor pain and anxiety and improving pregnant women satisfaction, highlighting the value of non-pharmacological interventions during the active phase of labor. Recommendation: Implemented educational programs for pregnant women to promote non-pharmacological pain management methods during labor.

Research topics

  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18956461

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.