article · Frontiers in Industrial Engineering
Introduction Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector often struggle with inefficiencies, defective products, and weak employee–management collaboration, all of which weaken their competitiveness and long-term sustainability. This case study explores the implementation of a lean implementation program at H4A Pty Ltd, a composite manufacturing plant in response to persistent reworks, and delays which affect productivity. The study aims to assess how 5S, facility layout and workplace cooperation impact the achievement of key operational performance indicators. The lean approach adopted in the study aligns closely with Sustainable Development Goals 4 and 8, supporting SMEs in enhancing their sustainability, responsibility, and competitiveness through quality education thereby contributing to the advancement of a more resilient and sustainable economy. Methods The study focused on 5S methodology, facility layout changes using multi criteria decision making (MCDM) Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and improved monitoring to eliminate defective products. Implementation involved structured employee training, participatory decision-making workshops, and management support to ensure sustainability. Results Results demonstrated significant improvements in efficiency, including a marked reduction in defective products, improved workflow due to optimized facility layout, and stronger communication between management and staff. Defect rates were reduced to zero during the implementation phase, while key performance indicators (KPIs) for productivity showed consistent upward trends. Discussion Although the study was limited to only one firm, the findings suggest that integrating 5S with MCDM-based facility layout provides a replicable strategy for manufacturing firms seeking to improve productivity, meet KPIs, and foster a cooperative workplace environments, while advancing sustainable development objectives.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/fieng.2025.1670308
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.