article · Revue d économie politique
The impact of election closeness on the likelihood of monotonicity paradox has recently been studied by some authors (e.g., Lepelley et al., 2018;Miller, 2017).It was shown that the frequency of such a paradox significantly increases as elections become more closely contested.This paper aims to analyze how the closeness of an election affects other well-known paradoxes of voting.Based on the Impartial Anonymous Culture (IAC) assumption, our preliminary results show that closeness has also a significant effect on the likelihood of observing the studied voting paradoxes in the class of scoring rules and scoring elimination rules.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3917/redp.351.0113
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
