article · Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis
International narratives frequently treat the Arab world as a uniform cultural bloc, yet reactions to sporting defeat demonstrate significant political and rhetorical divisions. An examination of public reactions to eliminations among national football teams from Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, and Saudi Arabia reveals distinct discursive registers rather than a single shared voice. These include externalising grievances, claiming personal honour, asserting institutional accountability, and applying state capture to sporting narratives. These varied framing strategies correspond directly to the legitimation requirements of different governance models, such as republics seeking national unity, executive monarchies demanding dynastic loyalty, and modernising systems demonstrating institutional responsibility. Furthermore, discourse varies across local sites such as coaches, federations, and state media. The authority to narrate a sporting loss corresponds with political vulnerability, dictating who receives public recognition and who is removed from their post.
Broad generalisations often obscure the genuine political complexities of the Arab world. Demonstrating how governments, media, and sporting bodies handle defeat shows that sports communication is closely bound to domestic political legitimacy. This provides international observers with a clearer understanding of how different governance systems manage public sentiment, assign liability, and construct national unity through major global events.
The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
“The Arab world” is routinely invoked as a single cultural bloc, and the record eight Arab nations at the 2026 FIFA World Cup were framed as a single collective story. This study asks whether that assumed unity survives the stark exhibition of national identity in defeat, and what the answer reveals about power dynamics. Combining the Discourse-Historical Approach, Hallidayan transitivity, and Appraisal theory with a Gramscian account of hegemony, it analyses how Arab national teams discursively construct their eliminations across coach, player, federation, state, and press sites, in the original Arabic and French. A four-case study encompassing Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, and Saudi Arabia finds not one “Arab” register. Instead multiple registers exist, including externalising grievance, personal honour-and-progress, institutional accountability, and asymmetric capture, and argues that these differences are not merely cultural but political, that is, each register performs legitimation work specific to its structure of rule, from the manufacture of national unity by a legitimacy-contested republic, through the elicitation of dynastic loyalty by an executive monarchy, and the enactment of accountability by a modernising one, to a republic that embraces its team in anticipation and withdraws from the accounting of its defeat. Capture proves calibrated rather than given, states consecrating the record-breaking while letting the merely excellent pass as routine. The discourse fractures even within a single nation, depending on the production site. The authority to voice a loss comes with the liability to answer for it, as demonstrated by a coach being honoured, a federation president resigning, and a foreign technician being dismissed. Consequently, who may speak for a nation, and who may be sacrificed on its behalf, follow one political logic. The study thus offers discourse-level evidence against the essentialist treatment of “the Arab world” and a comparative model of sporting defeat as a site for producing consent discursively, analysing how defeat discourse articulates hegemonic projects rather than whether it secures them.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32996/jpda.2026.5.5.4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
