article · Physiology
The cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway functions to counterbalance the innate immune response to inflammatory disorders including sepsis. Considering the reported contradictory role of adenosine in inflammation, the present study investigated whether central adenosine A2a receptors (A2aARs) arbitrate the cholinergic modulation of cardiovascular and autonomic dysfunction induced by sepsis in conscious rats. Rats were instrumented with femoral and intracisternal (i.c.) catheters for hemodynamic monitoring and central drug administration, respectively, and sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). The intravenous treatment with nicotine (100 μg/kg) 24-hr post-CLP reversed the hypotension, depression of time- and frequency-domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV) and sympathovagal imbalance induced by sepsis. Central administration of CGS21680 (A2aAR agonist, 2 μg/rat i.c.) accentuated the hypotensive response to sepsis on its own and blunted the rises in blood pressure caused by subsequently administered nicotine. Additionally, CGS21680 suppressed the nicotine-evoked increments in HRV indexof cardiac vagal control. The ameliorating action of CGS21680 on cardiovascular protection conferred by nicotine was paralleled with the abolition of nicotine counteraction of the sepsis-evoked augmentation of the protein expression of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and A2aARs in brainstem nuclei of the solitary tract (NTS) and rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). On the other hand, the interrelated cardiovascular and molecular effects of nicotine were maintained following central blockade of A2aARs by 8-(3-chlorosteryl) caffeine (CSC, 40 μg/rat i.c.). The data suggest that medullary A2aARs restrain the machinery by which the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway acts defensively to rectify cardiovascular and autonomic consequences of sepsis. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1152/physiol.2025.40.s1.0014
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.