MARATTO

article · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education

The Arabic Lubben Social Network Scale-6: Psychometric Validation, Measurement Invariance, and Social Support Profiles in Arabic-Speaking Older Adults

2026Open accessUniversity of Sfax

Abstract

This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Arabic version of the 6-Item Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6). The LSNS-6 was translated, culturally adapted, and administered, alongside the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS), to 327 Arabic-speaking adults aged 60 years and older. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the hypothesized two-factor structure (Family and Friends), and measurement invariance was evaluated across key sociodemographic and lifestyle variables. Convergent validity was assessed through correlations with MOS-SSS domains. Item response theory (IRT) analyses examined item discrimination and threshold parameters. Latent class analysis (LCA) explored whether the LSNS-6 could identify subgroups with distinct patterns of social connectedness and perceived support. The Arabic LSNS-6 demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.83; ω = 0.84) and supported the expected two-factor structure with satisfactory model fit (CFI = 0.963; TLI = 0.931; SRMR = 0.03). Convergent validity was evidenced by moderate correlations with overall perceived social support (r = 0.51). IRT analyses indicated strong discrimination for most items, and LCA identified four distinct latent classes. Overall, the Arabic LSNS-6 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing social isolation among older Arabic-speaking adults.

Research topics

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe16030040

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.