article · Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Policy shifts targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives during Donald Trump's second presidential term have generated significant repercussions across government, higher education, and private enterprise. These measures created an atmosphere of apprehension, intensified political polarisation, and deepened existing systemic inequalities. Beyond direct federal mandates, the broader political agenda produced unintended consequences, notably a chilling effect on private sector inclusion programmes and the emergence of informal shadow diversity initiatives designed to operate discreetly. While originating within the United States, the influence of these policies extends internationally, shaping global discourse, policy, and practice surrounding equity and fairness. Despite substantial rollbacks, the current environment is characterised as an interruption rather than an absolute halt to long-term equity goals, prompting organised resistance, ongoing advocacy, and strategic steps to protect inclusive progress across multiple sectors.
Shifts in public policy can alter how institutions, universities, and commercial enterprises approach fairness and representation. Understanding the consequences of anti-diversity actions helps observers recognise systemic risks, such as corporate programme retrenchment or informal workplace adjustments, while highlighting how domestic political mandates can rapidly alter international standards and dialogues concerning social justice.
The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Purpose This article aims to critically analyse and critique the impact of President Donald Trump’s second term on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the United States of America and beyond. It aims to document the policy changes enacted under Trump, explore the resulting consequences for various sectors (government, higher education and private sectors) and assess the broader implications for social justice and global conversations around equity. The article also serves as a call to action, urging continued advocacy and resistance against the rollback of DEI progress. Design/methodology/approach This viewpoint article offers a range of perspectives on the impact of the anti-DEI agenda from several DEI scholars who edit the journal. This critical approach draws from multiple sources of information to enrich and provide a more nuanced understanding on the impact of Trump’s policies on DEI. Findings President Trump’s anti-DEI agenda had a profound and far-reaching impact on DEI efforts, creating a climate of fear, exacerbating existing inequalities, intensifying political polarization and having ramifications beyond the borders of the United States of America. The paper also highlights the indirect and unintended consequences, such as the chilling effect on private sector DEI initiatives and the rise of “shadow” DEI programs. Research limitations/implications The article draws from secondary sources (news articles, policy documents and existing research). The authors’ scholarships on DEI and the Trump administration’s negative stance towards DEI might influence their perspectives and conclusions. Practical implications The authors close with a strong call to action, encouraging continued advocacy and resistance to the erosion of DEI progress. This pragmatic approach moves beyond simple criticism and offers concrete steps for future action. They suggest that the current anti-DEI sentiment represents a temporary setback in the long-term progress towards equity and inclusion. Social implications President Trump’s anti-DEI policies have global implications, influencing policy and practice in other countries and impacting international conversations around fairness and equity. Originality/value The article provides a valuable record of the significant shift in DEI policy and practice under the second Trump administration. This account will be a crucial resource for future researchers studying this period and its impact. This critical analysis also provides valuable insights for both scholars and activists working to advance DEI.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1108/edi-02-2025-0116
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
