article · Cleaner Energy Systems
• CH has better fuel economy at an air flow rate of 7.21 m 3 /h than all other briquette samples. • CH and SD have higher igniting potential than low rank coal . • All briquette samples produced had higher fixed carbon contents than lignite. • CC and PKS produce less ash and, therefore, have better capacity to enhance the longevity of boilers. • the daily average PM2.5 emissions for SD was higher the recommended safe limit. This study evaluates the fuel properties of five briquette samples made of Saw Dust (SD), Cocoa Shell (CS), Corn Cob (CC), Palm Kernell Shell (PKS) and Coconut Husk (CH), blended with starch at 50 % binder ratio to assess their suitability as boiler fuels, addressing the need to transition to cleaner, more efficient and sustainable boiler fuels for effective decarbonization of the heat and power sector of industry in Ghana. Pertinent solid fuel properties were measured to characterize fuel performance ranges. Environmental implications were also assessed through emissions measurements. SD emerges with the lowest relaxation ratio (1.39), indicating superior stability during transportation. CC exhibits the highest HHV (25.22 MJ/kg), while CH (187 g/h) demonstrates superior fuel economy. CH (27.93 %wt.) presents higher igniting potential, while CC and PKS may necessitate combustion-enhancing additives for ignition. CC (12.34 ± 2.25 wt. %) yields lesser ash, potentially enhancing boiler performance and guaranteeing minimum maintenance as compared with the other briquette samples. Four-day average measurements reveal minimal CO 2 and CO emissions for all samples, indicating negligible environmental threat. PM2.5 emissions mostly conform to WHO safety thresholds, albeit SD exceeding the recommended limit. The diversity of desirable fuel properties obtained, barring the few anomalies observed, demonstrate that briquettes hold the key to achieving fuel resource, environmental, and performance sustainability so far as boilers are concerned. The results also serve as pointers for further research to consolidate knowledge on more detailed fuel performance characteristics.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cles.2025.100185
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
