article · Water Practice & Technology
ABSTRACT This study evaluates the performance of electrodialysis (ED) using the CMX/ACS membrane pair, nanofiltration (NF) with the NF90 or NF270 membranes, and reverse osmosis (RO) with the BW30 membrane for fluoride removal in groundwater from Ben Guerir. This region is characterized by a salinity of 1.2 g/L and a fluoride concentration of 2.32 ppm. The results indicate that ED achieved good water quality with a demineralization rate of 40% at a cost of 0.2275 AMD/m3. NF using the NF270 membrane produced water of acceptable quality for a cost of 0.1033 AMD/m3. In contrast, both RO with the BW30 membrane and NF with the NF90 membrane yielded water with a highly aggressive chemical profile, necessitating remineralization. Remineralization, achieved by adding filtered water, reduced the cost to 0.0650 AMD/m3 for the NF90 membrane and 0.0658 AMD/m3 for the BW30 membrane, whereas remineralization using lime resulted in costs of 0.126 AMD/m3 for NF90 and 0.1343 AMD/m3 for BW30. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the most efficient and cost-effective solution for fluoride removal in this context is either NF using the NF90 membrane or RO with the BW30 membrane, combined with remineralization by adding filtered water.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2026.238
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.