MARATTO

article · International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

T-tube insertion as a salvage procedure for failed primary repair in penetrating esophageal injury complicated by sepsis: a case report from low resource setting

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: A 28-year-old female presented with a cervical esophageal stab injury. An initial primary repair failed, and the patient developed severe sepsis. Surgical re-exploration revealed two esophageal perforations. The lateral perforation was repaired, and a T-tube was inserted through the anterior defect to create a controlled fistula. A feeding jejunostomy was also performed. The patient recovered fully following 9 weeks of T-tube drainage and enteral feeding. Clinical discussion: Cervical esophageal perforations present unique management challenges due to their proximity to vital structures and the high risk of mediastinal sepsis. Primary repair is preferred when feasible; however, failure can result in uncontrolled leakage and infection. In such cases, T-tube drainage provides a controlled fistula that allows decompression, sepsis control, and spontaneous closure once healing occurs. Compared to advanced techniques such as endoscopic stenting or vacuum-assisted closure, T-tube diversion is simple, inexpensive, and suitable for resource-limited environments. Adequate drainage, nutritional support through feeding jejunostomy, and close follow-up are critical to achieving favourable outcomes. Conclusion: T-tube drainage is a valuable salvage option in the management of complicated oesophageal perforations in resource-limited settings and nutritional support through feeding jejunostomy are key to optimizing outcomes.

Research topics

  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Foreign Body Medical Cases
  • Trauma Management and Diagnosis

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1097/rc9.0000000000000136

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.