MARATTO

review · PLoS ONE

Systematic review on the compliance of WHO guidelines in the management of patients with advanced HIV disease in Africa: The case of cryptococcal antigen screening

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening for people presenting with advanced HIV disease (AHD) and for those with positive CrAg without evidence of meningitis to initiate preemptive antifungal medication. Data on the implementation of WHO recommendations regarding CrAg screening is limited. We estimated pooled prevalence of CrAg screening uptake, cryptococcal antigenemia, lumbar puncture, cryptococcal meningitis and initiation of preemptive antifungal medication from available eligible published studies conducted in Africa. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2011 and December 2023. CrAg uptake was defined as percentage of eligible people (CD4 ≤ 200 cells/mm3 or WHO stage III/IV) who received cryptococcal antigen testing. Stratified analysis to compare uptake and cryptococcal antigenemia between studies that involved multiple vs single sites was performed. Using random effects models, we computed the pooled estimate of CrAg screening uptake, cryptococcal antigenemia, lumbar puncture, cryptococcal meningitis, preemptive antifungals treatment and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Ten studies with 18,820 individuals with AHD were analyzed. Overall, the pooled estimate of CrAg screening uptake was 57.1% (95% CI: 41.4-72.7). CrAg screening uptake was significantly lower among studies that involved multiple sites compared to those that involved single site, (47.3% vs 73.3%; p<0.001). Overall, the pooled prevalence of cryptococcal antigenemia was 9.6% (95% CI:6.4-12.9). Cryptococcal antigenemia was significantly lower among studies that involved multiple sites compared to those that involved single site, (9.1% vs 10.4%; p<0.001). Among those who tested positive for CrAg, 84.6% (95% CI: 54.1-99.0) received preemptive antifungal treatment, though nearly 25% did not undergo lumbar puncture, highlighting gaps in diagnostic follow-up. Six studies evaluated CrAg positive patients with lumbar puncture and the overall prevalence of lumbar puncture was 74.9% (48.0-94.8). The overall prevalence of cryptococcal meningitis was 58.1% (46.6-69.6). CONCLUSIONS: Not screening for CrAg among people with AHD and failure to initiate antifungal medications among eligible patients with cryptococcal antigenemia presents a significant missed opportunity. Emphasis on improving CrAg screening is critical given its proven cost-effective benefits.

Research topics

  • Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313453

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.