MARATTO

article · African Evaluation Journal

Swahili wisdom for shaping development evaluation practices

20242 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Dar es Salaam

Abstract

Background: African people demand the reformation of current development evaluation practices because they are less democratic and marginalise their ways of knowing and valuing. Objectives: This article examined wisdom in Swahili proverbs that could inspire and guide efforts to reform development evaluation practices to make them more democratic and transformative. Method: A total of 45 Swahili proverbs were analysed to uncover their wisdom and guidance on framing meanings and purposes of evaluation and the rights and duties of participants in the evaluation process. The appropriateness and feasibility of the framed meanings, purposes, rights and duties were tested in a survey involving 61 Swahili-speaking evaluators. Results: Based on the uncovered wisdom, development evaluations are social activities initiated by and involving people to systematically inquire and assess aspects of ongoing or completed development projects and programmes to: (1) determine performances in keeping promises made, (2) determine preventive and corrective measures for possible and actual implementation challenges and (3) co-learn and co-produce histories of the completed development projects and programmes. Insights in these three development evaluation practices adequately guide respecting people’s rights and freedoms to initiate and lead the evaluations of their development projects and programmes and integrate their ways of knowing and valuing. Conclusion: Swahili wisdom provides solid theoretical bases and numerous methodological strategies for supporting people in initiating, conducting and using evaluations. Contribution: This research contributes to the proverb-based approach to developing African-rooted evaluation theories and methodologies by offering lessons on generating and applying proverbial wisdom to improve development evaluation practices.

Research topics

  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • International Development and Aid
  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v12i2.738

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.