MARATTO

article

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF RECURRENT TRACHEAL STENOSIS AFTER SURGERY

Abstract

*Surgery for tracheal stenosis is one of the main therapeutic weapons but it can be complicated. Redo surgery may be an effective alternative. *Among the 45 patients operated on for tracheal stenosis during the study period, recurrence was noted in 5 patients. The recurrence appeared after 2months in average[1-3]. The average age was 37years old[15-48] with a M/F sex ratio of1.5. All of our patients were intubated and the average duration of the intubation was 17days[5-36]. Tracheostomy was necessary in 2cases. Dyspnea was the main symptom(5patients). The average time to onset of symptoms was 42days[1-150]. Bronchial endoscopy was performed in 1patient. In CT-scan, the average tracheal diameter reduction was 65%[50-70] and the average length of tracheal stenosis was 10mm[8-10]. The average distance between the glottis and the stenosis was 18mm[10-38]. The procedure consisted on tracheal resection and trachea-tracheal anastomosis in all cases. The average length of the resected trachea was 1.2mm[1-1.5](VS 3mm[2-6] for the first resection). The average operating time was 108minutes[80-165] (VS 106minutes [75-170] for the first resection).. All patients had a "guardian" chin at the end of the procedure. All patients were systematically treated with antibiotics postoperatively. The average drainage time was 3days[2-5] (VS 3days[2-5] for the first resection).. The post-operative course was uneventful for all patients. The average hospital stay was 6days[5-10] (VS 6days[4.8] for the first resection). No local recurrences were noted. *Redo surgery for recurrence of tracheal stenosis is certainly complex but allows definitive resolution of the tracheal damage. It requires rigorous surgical technique and a certain experience.

Research topics

  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Vascular Anomalies and Treatments

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2272

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.