MARATTO

article

Subclinical carotid artery stiffness in untreated OSAS is linked to symptoms and upper airway anatomical profiles.

Abstract

<bold>Aim:</bold> To assess carotid artery stiffness (CAS) and intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) using ultrasound (Carotid Studio software) and examine linkage with OSAS-related symptoms and upper airway configuration. <bold>Methods:</bold> 45 patients with untreated OSAS diagnosed by full polysomnography and 45 asymptomatic controls (n=23 with body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m<sup>2</sup> and n=22 with BMI <30kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included. CAS, carotid IMT, and upper airway parameters were assessed using ultrasound. <bold>Results:</bold> OSAS patients (age: 57±9 years, BMI: 44±6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, neck circumference: 46.2±4.3 cm) had an average apnoea-hypopnoea index of 35±16/h with significant daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness score (ESS): 16.0±2.5). CAS, tongue base thickness, and retro-lingual inspiratory diameter were greater in OSAS vs. asymptomatic controls regardless of their BMI (all p<0.001). However, carotid IMT was greater in OSAS than in non-obese controls (p<0.05). After adjusting for groups, age, and gender; both ESS and tongue base thickness (measured by ultrasound) explained 60% of the variance in carotid artery stiffness (<bold>Figure</bold>). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Carotid artery stiffness is greater in untreated patients with OSAS than in asymptomatic control subjects and can be predicted from OSAS-related symptoms and upper airway anatomical configuration. <fig><object-id>erjor;11/suppl_16/82/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Research topics

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2025.82

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.