MARATTO

article · Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research

Study on the influence of government expenditure on housing supply

2026Open accessUniversity of Eldoret

In plain language

An analysis of Kenyan housing data between 1980 and 2024 evaluates how public spending influences residential housing supply. Using fully modified ordinary least squares regression alongside vector error correction and ordinary least squares robustness tests, the research reveals that government housing expenditure exerts a significant negative effect on housing supply. Specifically, a one percent rise in public housing spending corresponds to a decrease of approximately 0.8 housing units supplied. These findings indicate that state expenditure in this domain is currently misallocated, which inadvertently harms private residential investment, restricts employment growth, and slows construction activity. To counter these adverse outcomes, shifting toward private sector partnerships offers a viable path forward. Harnessing private funding and expertise to build and maintain properties could lower development costs and improve spending efficiency, creating a balanced, market-driven approach to tackle the ongoing housing shortfall.

Key takeaways

  • Government housing expenditure in Kenya from 1980 to 2024 had a negative and statistically significant impact on housing supply.
  • A one percent increase in public spending on housing is associated with an estimated reduction of 0.8 supplied housing units.
  • Current public expenditure patterns may reduce private sector investment, slow housing provision, and impede employment within the construction industry.
  • Integrating private sector capital and technical expertise into housing delivery can lower development costs and improve public spending efficiency.

Why it matters

Public expenditure is frequently expected to increase housing availability, but ineffective allocation can actively deter private investment and slow down construction. Demonstrating that government spending has reduced housing output highlights the need to re-evaluate national budget allocations. Policymakers and urban planners must understand these dynamics to design balanced housing strategies that combine targeted state support with private sector efficiency to resolve housing shortages.

Commercialisation angle

This macroeconomic policy research does not present a deployable commercial technology or product. However, its findings inform public-private partnership models, housing finance programmes, and procurement strategies for construction firms and real estate developers. Because the work is empirical economic analysis rather than a technological innovation, its application pathway is at a policy and strategic level, requiring governments and private developers to structure joint investment frameworks for residential housing projects.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The debate over whether government spending on housing aids or impedes residential investment and housing supply remains a significant topic of discussion. This study examines the effects of government housing expenditure on housing supply in Kenya from 1980 to 2024. Utilizing a time series data regression method, the analysis employs a fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) approach, along with robustness tests, to explore the relationship between the relevant variables. The findings indicate that government housing expenditure has a negative and significant impact on housing supply in Kenya. Specifically, a 1% increase in public housing expenditure is associated with a potential reduction of 0.8 housing units supplied. These results suggest that public spending may adversely affect investment in the housing sector, hinder employment, and slow the rate of housing supply. The VECM and OLS robustness tests indicate that public spending harms housing provision, suggesting that government expenditure on housing is not being allocated effectively and should be reassessed. The study recommends that the government should harness private sector expertise and funding to facilitate the construction and maintenance of housing. This approach could potentially lower costs and enhance the efficiency of government expenditure. A balanced strategy that integrates government support with market-driven solutions is essential for addressing the housing crisis in the Kenyan construction sector.

Research topics

  • Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.20448/ajeer.v13i2.9214

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.