MARATTO

article · Case Studies in Construction Materials

Study on properties of clay brick incorporating sludge of water treatment plant and agriculture waste

2020135 citationsOpen accessSuez University

In plain language

Incorporating waste into fired clay bricks presents an alternative method for recycling industrial and agricultural residues. Investigations evaluated brick mixtures where water treatment plant sludge substituted clay at a fifty percent ratio, combined with varying amounts of rice straw ash, sugarcane bagasse ash, and wheat straw ash at five, ten, and fifteen percent of the sludge weight. After seven days of air drying and firing at nine hundred degrees Celsius, the physical, mechanical, and microstructural characteristics were measured. While the addition of agricultural ashes lowered compressive strength relative to mixes without them, replacements between five and ten percent produced viable eco-friendly bricks. Microscopic examination confirmed a more porous structure, which reduced bulk density and yielded lighter bricks. Using a five percent dose of agricultural waste ash balances structural efficiency, cost reduction, and environmental relief.

Key takeaways

  • Water treatment plant sludge can replace clay at a fifty percent ratio in fired brick manufacturing.
  • Adding rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, or wheat straw ash reduces the compressive strength of the resulting bricks.
  • Formulations containing five to ten percent agricultural waste ash by weight of the sludge yield viable, eco-friendly fired clay bricks.
  • Incorporating agricultural ash creates a more porous microstructure that lowers bulk density, producing lighter bricks.

Why it matters

Disposing of agricultural residues and water treatment plant sludge creates severe environmental burdens. Transforming these waste streams into construction materials reduces demand for natural clay and cuts disposal requirements. Producing lighter fired bricks can also reduce structural weight in buildings, potentially lowering transport and construction expenses while promoting sustainable building practices.

Commercialisation angle

This early-stage research provides laboratory-tested formulations for brick manufacturers seeking lower-cost, eco-friendly raw material substitutes. The findings demonstrate that five to ten percent agricultural ash additions produce lighter fired clay bricks. Real-world application would require scaling up beyond laboratory kiln trials, validating structural building code compliance, and securing reliable supply chains for water treatment sludge and agricultural waste.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Green building raw materials have become attractive alternatives for mitigating sustainability issues. Agricultural waste has been used as natural components in the production of alternative building products, and the use of burned clay bricks is a new waste disposal method. The main objective of the paper is to investigate the effects of agricultural waste (rice straw, sugarcane bagasse and wheat straw ashes) in clay bricks. This paper discusses the physical–mechanical properties and the micro-structure of clay bricks when incorporated with the sludge of water treatment plants (SWTP) to replace clay at a 50 % ratio. One mixture was prepared as a control mix without agriculture waste. Each group containing three mixes was used with 5 %, 10 % and 15 % by weight of SWTP content. The green bricks was air dried in sunlight for another 7 days and burnt at 900 °C, keeping them at the highest temperature for 3 h. Mechanical and physical properties of these bricks have been investigated. It was observed that clay bricks containing rice straw ash (RSA), sugar cane bagasse ash (SBA) and wheat straw ash (WSA) had lower compressive strength compared to non-RSA, SBA, and WSA clay bricks. The replacement 5–10 % of RSA, SBA and WSA by weight of SWTP into brick molding compound produces eco-friendly fired clay brick. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study confirms the porous microstructure of the brick specimens combining RSA, SBA and WSA resulting in lower bulk density resulting in lighter and more economical structures. Based on this analysis, it can be established that brick samples with lower doses of RSA, SBA and WSA (i.e. 5 % SWTP weight) will not only reduce the environmental pressure but will also lead to more efficient and economical development.

Research topics

  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Hygrothermal properties of building materials
  • Building materials and conservation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00397

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.