MARATTO

article · AIP Advances

Structures and solvent effects on the 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of the family of three <i>pro</i>-lithospermate molecules: DFT study

20235 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

The solvent effects on the structures and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of a series of three pro-lithospermate molecules are studied. These molecules include methyl pro-lithospermate, ethyl pro-lithospermate, and n-butyl pro-lithospermate, which exhibit enantiomers and diastereoisomers. The trans-oriented enantiomers were observed by Yu et al. [Nat. Prod. Res. 31(21), 2505–2512 (2017)] and are the subject of the present study. The density functional theory was validated using the gauge-including atomic orbital/B3LYP-D3BJ/6–31++G(d,p) and continuous set of gauge transformation (CSGT)/the long-range corrected Tao, Perdew, Staroverov, and Scuseria’s τ-dependent gradient-corrected correlation-exchange functional (LC-TPSS)TPSS/cc-pVTZ methods. The chemical shifts of 1H and 13C were calculated in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), methanol, and water. It turns out that solvent effects are weak on the geometrical parameters (bond lengths and bond angles). The harmonic oscillator model of the aromaticity index was used to calculate the aromaticity of the subunit rings. With regard to the available experimental results, the chemical shifts of 1H and 13C are reproduced better by B3LYP-D3BJ/6–31++G(d,p) than by LC-TPSSTPSS/cc-pVTZ in the DMSO medium. The solvent effects are significant on the 13C chemical shift, mostly for protic solvents, and insignificant on 1H. The vicinal spin–spin coupling constants of protons were calculated. The coupling constant of trans-olefinic and ortho-aromatic protons fits well with the experiment.

Research topics

  • Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1063/5.0139044

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.