MARATTO

article · Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science

Structural Model Validation: Evaluating the Goodness-of-Fits Indices of GUAM Framework

Abstract

Models are fitted to data in an attempt to understand underlying processes that have been operating. To be useful, they should be parsimonious and clearly understood. For structural models, a huge variety of fit indices has been developed. These indices, however, can point to conclusions about the extent to which a model actually matches the observed data. The study evaluates the goodness-of-fit of a Generic Usability and Acceptance Model (GUAM). Measures for the study were adopted from the GUAM, and a questionnaire tagged Learning Innovations Adoption Questionnaire was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test and understand the underlying structure of the proposed model, using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). As regards model fit, the model went through a number of iterations until a good model was realised. Validity and reliability of the proposed generic model were also examined, both showing satisfactory validity and good internal consistency, which indicate that a good model fit has been attained. On this basis, GUAM model is considered a valid and reliable theoretical tool for learning innovations adoption and use.

Research topics

  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.9734/jesbs/2025/v38i41396

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.