MARATTO

article · Benha Journal of Applied Sciences

Structural mapping and kinematic history of the Qena-Safaga Shear Zone (Egyptian Nubian Shield, East African Orogen)

2024Open accessBenha University

Abstract

The Qena- Safaga Shear Zone (QSSZ) is a megashear belt separating the Northern- and the Central- Tectonic Provinces of the Egyptian Nubian Shield (ENS). Processing of remotely sensed data of the Landsat-8, ASTER and Sentinel 2A, accompanied by field/structural investigation made it possible to construct a plausible structural map for this high strain zone. A wide variety of Neoproterozoic litho-units outcrop in the area, including ophiolitic mélange, syn- tectonic granitoids, late- tectonic granitoids, Dokhan Volcanics and post- tectonic granitoids. Dike swarms traverse some of these units. The automatic lineament extraction using SRTM and PALSAR images verified that the dominant structural trend is the NE-SW. Other trends, comprising E-W (to ENE-WSW), NW-SE (to NNW-SSE) and N-S (to NNE-SSW) are also recognized. The main structural elements documented in the area embrace foliations and lineations, faults and shear zones, as well as shear zone-related structures (e.g. folds, duplexes and flower structures). The sense of movement along the aforementioned shear trends can be detected by a wide variety of kinematic indicators include mylonite, boudinage structure and deformed pebbles. The geological structures documented along the QSSZ indicate a brittle-ductile tectonic regime accompanied with voluminous granitic intrusions of various composition. Such structural and tectonic setting advocates a complex tectonic history characterized by extensional and transtensional tectonic regimes. The obtained results are significantly contributed to our knowledge on the high strain shear belts in the ENS.

Research topics

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/bjas.2024.281703.1399

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.