MARATTO

review · International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Stem cell therapy use in patients with dementia: a systematic review

202510 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Bamenda

In plain language

This systematic review examines thirty-two studies, including twenty-one clinical trials and eleven preclinical investigations, to evaluate the efficacy of stem cell therapy for dementia. Preclinical research heavily utilised transgenic animal models, notably mice, alongside stem cells derived from human placental tissue, umbilical cord tissue, and induced pluripotent stem cell neuronal precursors. Delivery occurred primarily through stereotactic or intravenous routes. Findings across these models demonstrate significant reductions in neuroinflammation, protection against amyloid-beta toxicity, and improvements in spatial memory. Key therapeutic mechanisms include the modulation of microglial responses, support for neurogenesis, and anti-amyloidogenic effects, evidenced by decreased inflammatory markers such as IL-1β and TNF-α together with increased anti-inflammatory cytokines. While these results underscore the neuroprotective and immunomodulatory capacities of stem cell approaches, bridging the gap between preclinical insights and clinical implementation remains a necessary step for novel dementia interventions.

Key takeaways

  • A systematic review identified thirty-two relevant papers, comprising twenty-one clinical trials and eleven preclinical studies on stem cell therapies for dementia.
  • Preclinical models demonstrated improvements in spatial memory, reductions in neuroinflammation, and defence against amyloid-beta toxicity.
  • Primary mechanisms of action involved neurogenesis support, anti-amyloidogenic activity, and shifts towards anti-inflammatory cytokine profiles.
  • Commonly investigated sources included human placenta-derived and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, delivered via stereotactic or intravenous administration.

Why it matters

Dementia presents a growing global healthcare burden with limited restorative treatment options. By evaluating both preclinical models and clinical trials, this research clarifies how stem cell therapies reduce harmful brain inflammation and support cognitive recovery, helping guide future therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative decline.

Commercialisation angle

The findings highlight therapeutic avenues for biotechnology firms and clinical researchers developing advanced biologics for neurodegenerative disorders. Because the evidence encompasses early-stage animal research alongside existing clinical trials, commercial applications remain in development, requiring further translational research to bridge preclinical mechanisms with scalable, validated clinical treatments.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stem cell therapy (SCT) is increasingly recognized for its potential in managing cognitive impairment, particularly that of dementia. The application of SCT aims to restore cognitive functioning in people living with dementia. Beyond pre-clinical studies, several clinical trials have evaluated specific stem cell (SC) types for their efficacy in treating dementia. AIMS & OBJECTIVES: To assess the status and efficacy of pre-clinical and clinical studies utilizing SCs as a therapeutic approach for dementia. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using two electronic databases: MEDLINE and Embase. We reviewed studies on the application of SCs in dementia, focusing on the following aspects: Animal models used in pre-clinical studies, tissue sources of SCs and donor species, and administrative routes and outcome assessments. Included papers comprised randomized control trials (RCTs) and original studies, while those involving adjuvant therapies for dementia were excluded. Quality assessment criteria included relevance to the research question, type of SCs, stage of SC transplantation, duration and route of administration, methods for outcome assessment, and the total number of animals implicated. RESULTS: A total of 32 papers were included, encompassing 21 clinical trials and 11 preclinical studies. The preclinical studies employed various transgenic animal models to evaluate SCT outcomes. Animal models of dementia, particularly transgenic mice, have proven instrumental in replicating human disease mechanisms. These models facilitate understanding of pathophysiology and preclinical testing of therapeutic interventions. Studies utilizing SCT demonstrated notable improvements in spatial memory, reduced neuroinflammation, and protection against amyloid-beta (Aβ) toxicity. Key mechanisms included modulation of inflammation, microglial immune responses, neurogenesis support, and anti-amyloidogenic effects. Preclinical studies predominantly employed human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (PD-MSCs), umbilical cord-derived MSCs (U-MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal precursors. Administration routes varied, with stereotactic and intravenous injections targeting affected brain regions. Reductions in inflammatory markers such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and increases in anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-4 and IL-10 were observed. These outcomes emphasize the immunomodulatory and neuroprotective capacities of SCT. CONCLUSION: SCT shows promise in addressing dementia-related pathologies by leveraging diverse therapeutic mechanisms. Continued refinement of preclinical models and translational research is essential to bridge gaps between preclinical findings and clinical applications, potentially paving the way for novel treatments for dementia.

Research topics

  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12245-025-00876-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.