article · Geosystems and Geoenvironment
• Paleoenvironmental analysis using stable isotopes and palynofacies. • δ 13 C org and C/N molar values confirmed the influence of terrestrial C₃ plants. • Palynofacies assemblage suggested deposition in non-marine environments. • The western flank revealed carbonate-starved environment during the Late Cretaceous. The Mamu Formation is an important sedimentary unit within the Anambra Basin, southern Nigeria. The presence of coal seams and carbonaceous shales within this formation has implications on its hydrocarbon potential and paleoenvironment of deposition. This study integrated stable isotopes of organic carbon and total nitrogen ( δ 13 C org , δ 15 N TN ) and palynology to characterize the depositional environment of the Mamu Shales located at the western flank of the Anambra Basin in Nigeria. The δ 13 C org values ranged from -25.9 to -24.6‰ VPDB, while the δ 15 N TN values varied from 3.0 to 5.6‰ Air-N₂. Additionally, the carbon-to-nitrogen molar ratios (C/N) fell between 10.8 and 19.3. These findings suggest that the organic matter primarily originated from terrestrial C₃ grasses and trees. The range of TOC, HI and T max values suggested that these shales are good hydrocarbon source rocks. The palynomaceral (PM) assemblages were characterized by abundant, poorly sorted small and medium-sized PM-1 and PM-2, alongside relatively common lath-shaped PM-4. These assemblages were associated with lower occurrences of PM-3, structureless organic matter, and land-derived palynomorphs. Together, these observations indicate a predominantly terrestrial paleoenvironment marked by rainforest vegetation. From the δ 15 N TN values, it appears that symbiotic nitrogen-fixing plants served as the primary nitrogen source for the black shales, which formed in a continental marginal environment. Overall, our results suggest that the episodic incursions of the Trans-Saharan Seaway were minimal at the western flank of the basin, indicating a carbonate-starved paleoenvironment during the Late Cretaceous.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.geogeo.2026.100492
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.