MARATTO

article · Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Spatial Risk Indices Distribution via Contamination and Radioactivity of Atshan and Darhib Talc Mines, Arabian Nubian Shield

2026Open accessAl-Azhar University

Abstract

This study assessed the environmental effects and radiation doses associated with talc deposits collected from the Atshan and Darhib regions, South Eastern Desert of Egypt. The geochemical analysis distinguishes Atshan's Ni-Cr-Co-V enrichment from Darhib's Cu-Pb signature, reflecting a strong mafic-ultramafic influence on metal fractionation. Ecological indices identify Ni and Ca as the primary drivers of contamination, causing “Very High” cumulative risk (PERI >1100) specifically at the Atshan site. While non-carcinogenic hazards remain within safe limits, the Total Cancer Risk slightly exceeds the 1 × 10 −4 threshold, indicating a potential threat from carcinogenic metals. These results highlight the urgent need for remediation to alleviate the severe potential environmental and public health impacts linked to these mineralized deposits. The average amounts of 232 Th, 226 Ra, and 40 K in the Atshan and Darhib deposits are 3.59 ± 0.58, 11.1, and 111.74 ± 28.85 Bq/kg, respectively. The reported activity concentrations comply with generally accepted global reporting standards. Between the two studied talc deposits, the northern site (Atshan) exhibits relatively higher activity concentrations of 40 K (av. 119.57 ± 27.67 Bq/kg), 232 Th (av. 3.64 ± 0.51 Bq/kg), and overall contribution (av. 134.3 ± 27.69 Bq/kg), compared to the southern site (Darhib). In connection with such attempts, several radiological criteria have been calculated for these deposits. The fact that these measurements' values are lower than internationally reported averages suggests that the radiation delivered has very little impact.

Research topics

  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2026.104431

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.