article · Recent Advances in Natural Sciences
Assessing groundwater recharge is essential for managing water resources sustainably, especially in semi-arid regions. In order to assess groundwater reserves for residential and agricultural use, this study examines the spatial and temporal distribution of recharge in the Kabago watershed in Southern Zamfara State, Nigeria. The watershed, which is roughly 5.97 km² in size and is composed of migmatite, gneiss, schist, and granitic rocks, has a Sudan savannah climate with high evapotranspiration and little annual rainfall (1164 mm). Hydrological processes during a 21-year period (1990–2010) were simulated using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT 2012) linked with ArcGIS. SUFI-2 in SWAT-CUP was used for calibration and validation utilizing streamflow data from the Maru gauging station. With NSE values of 0.85 and 0.75, R2 values of 0.85 and 0.75, PBIAS of 2.5% and –1.3%, and RSR values of 0.43 and 0.52 for calibration and validation, respectively, the model performed satisfactorily. Soil water capacity, groundwater delay, baseflow coefficient, and surface runoff factors were among the sensitive characteristics. The results indicated that model-derived potential recharge values, which represent roughly 49% of annual precipitation, ranged from 379.93 to 678.88 mm/year with an average of 545.69 mm/year. Runoff and evapotranspiration were responsible for 15.35% (178.65 mm/year) and 33.24% (386.93 mm/year) of the water loss, respectively. Recharge variability was largely influenced by rainfall distribution, soil type, slope, and land use, with agricultural land promoting infiltration. Overall, the Kabago watershed functions as a significant recharge zone, though high evapotranspiration highlights vulnerability to land use and climate change. These findings provide a sound basis for groundwater management and policy in Zamfara and comparable semi-arid regions.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.61298/rans.2026.4.1.234
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.