MARATTO

article · Journal of diagnostic medical sonography

Sonographic Fetal Scalp Thickness as a Potential Indicator of Estimated Fetal Weight, in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of recording sonographic fetal scalp thickness (FST) to predict the estimated fetal weight (EFW), in third trimester of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 175 uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, at 27 to 40 gestational weeks, was included in this study. The FST was measured with sonography and defined as the distance between the fetal skin and the outer table, on a cross-section of the skull, along the parietal aspect of the fetal head. Measurements were taken twice, and the average of the measurements was recorded. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) was derived from the Hadlock’s formula. Simple linear and multiple linear regression models were performed to predict the EFW, based on the FST measures. Results: A strong positive correlation was demonstrated between FST and the EFW (r = 0.65, P < .01). The regression equation, EFW = 4.6*FST + 2.27 was derived, with a unit increase in FST yielding a 4.6 unit rise in EFW. Fetal scalp thickness and the fetal femur length (FL) accounted for about 93% (R 2 = 0.93) variability in EFW, while the fetal head circumference (HC) and FST accounted for 83% (R 2 = 0.83) variance in the EFW. Conclusion: A potential may exist to use FST as a viable indicator of EFW and could be used in conjunction with current fetal biometric parameters to improve EFW prediction.

Research topics

  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/87564793241250009

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.