MARATTO

article · Global Change Biology

Soil recalcitrant but not labile organic nitrogen mineralization contributes to microbial nitrogen immobilization and plant nitrogen uptake

202433 citationsZagazig University

Abstract

Soil organic nitrogen (N) mineralization not only supports ecosystem productivity but also weakens carbon and N accumulation in soils. Recalcitrant (mainly mineral-associated organic matter) and labile (mainly particulate organic matter) organic materials differ dramatically in nature. Yet, the patterns and drivers of recalcitrant (M<sub>Nrec</sub>) and labile (M<sub>Nlab</sub>) organic N mineralization rates and their consequences on ecosystem N retention are still unclear. By collecting M<sub>Nrec</sub> (299 observations) and M<sub>Nlab</sub> (299 observations) from 57 <sup>15</sup>N tracing studies, we found that soil pH and total N were the master factors controlling M<sub>Nrec</sub> and M<sub>Nlab</sub>, respectively. This was consistent with the significantly higher rates of M<sub>Nrec</sub> in alkaline soils and of M<sub>Nlab</sub> in natural ecosystems. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that M<sub>Nrec</sub> directly stimulated microbial N immobilization and plant N uptake, while M<sub>Nlab</sub> stimulated the soil gross autotrophic nitrification which discouraged ammonium immobilization and accelerated nitrate production. We also noted that M<sub>Nrec</sub> was more efficient at lower precipitation and higher temperatures due to increased soil pH. In contrast, M<sub>Nlab</sub> was more efficient at higher precipitation and lower temperatures due to increased soil total N. Overall, we suggest that increasing M<sub>Nrec</sub> may lead to a conservative N cycle, improving the ecosystem services and functions, while increasing M<sub>Nlab</sub> may stimulate the potential risk of soil N loss.

Research topics

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17290

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.