article
Reliable river discharge simulation generally relies on observed streamflow data for model calibration; however, such observations are often uncertain or unavailable in data-scarce regions, limiting the applicability of conventional hydrological models. This study presents a hybrid modeling framework that uses soil moisture as an alternative calibration variable to improve discharge simulations in the absence of reliable streamflow observations. The framework couples a two-layer version of the daily lumped MISDc (Modello Idrologico Semi-Distribuito in continuo) hydrological model with a Feedforward Neural Network (FFNN), which is employed to enhance parameter calibration by exploiting soil moisture dynamics. The proposed approach is evaluated across three contrasting basins: Tahanaout in semi-arid Morocco, and Colorso (Italy) and Bibeschbach (Luxembourg) in temperate climates. Both in situ and ERA5-Land soil moisture datasets are used as calibration inputs. Model performance is assessed using multiple hydrological metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), and the correlation coefficient (R). Results show that the hybrid MISDc-FFNN framework substantially improves river discharge simulations compared to the traditional model. Across all basins, MAE is reduced by up to 61%, KGE increases by more than 200%, and R improves by up to 87%, with consistent performance gains observed for both observed and reanalysis-based soil moisture. These findings demonstrate the potential of soil moisture driven calibration strategies to enhance hydrological modeling in data-scarce environments, offering a viable pathway for improved water resources assessment and flood risk management where discharge observations are limited or unreliable. Keywords: Soil moisture; river discharge simulation; hydrological modeling; machine learning; ERA5-Land; data-scarce regions; feedforward neural network
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu26-21830
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.