MARATTO

review · Discover Sustainability

Soil loss estimation in Ethiopia: a comprehensive review of the RUSLE model integrated with geospatial technologies

20259 citationsOpen accessJigjiga University

Abstract

Soil erosion in Ethiopia harms agricultural production, water quality, and overall ecosystem health. Effective soil loss estimation can help minimize these outcomes. The implementation of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in Ethiopia has not been sufficiently evaluated. Thus, the main objective of this review is to systematically review the comprehensive strengths and limitations of the RUSLE model applications for soil loss estimation. Specifically, it evaluates the specific parameters used, the type of input data, the validation approaches, and the role of GIS and remote sensing in the computation process of the RUSLE Model. An extensive search method was employed to classify suitable research papers about applying the RUSLE model in estimating soil erosion in Ethiopia. The review underscores that different approaches have been used to compute the five parameters of the RUSLE model. Key strengths of the RUSLE model include its widespread acceptance and adaptability to various environmental conditions; however, notable limitations are evident, regarding the validation and calibration processes. This review highlights that the scale of study areas varies widely, from 18.33 to 1,119,683 km2. Soil loss estimates across the reviewed studies ranged from 12.94 to 576 t ha−1 yr−1. The findings of this review presented here are critical for using the RUSLE model to estimate soil loss integrating it with other process-based models and the advanced machine learning technologies. Ultimately, this review aids in improving soil resource management and ecological sustainability in Ethiopia.

Research topics

  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
  • Groundwater and Watershed Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s43621-025-01037-8

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.