MARATTO

article · Environmental Microbiology Reports

Soil Biodiversity of <i>Eucalyptus saligna</i> : Insights Into Bacterial and Nematode Communities

2026Open accessUniversity of Limpopo

Abstract

Soil microorganisms and nematodes are key regulators of soil function, yet their co-occurrence in Eucalyptus rhizospheres remains poorly understood. In this exploratory study, we characterised bacterial and nematode communities associated with Eucalyptus saligna soils in Limpopo, South Africa, using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing and nematode surveys. Bacterial assemblages were dominated by Proteobacteria (42%), Acidobacteria (28%), Actinobacteria (12%) and Planctomycetes (9%). Eleven bacterial genera occurred across all sites, with Rhizobiales (prominence value, PV = 315,350) and Xanthobacteraceae (PV = 292,930) emerging as the most prominent taxa. Nematode surveys identified 19 genera, including plant-parasitic such as Meloidogyne (PV = 5759.1) and abundant free-living such as Tylolaimorphus (PV = 4150.0) and Acrobeloides (PV = 2900.0). Principal component analysis showed that bacterial communities were associated with soil pH, salinity and nitrogen forms, whereas nematode assemblages were associated with phosphate and sand content, together explaining 83%-90% of total variance. Network analysis indicated that all sampling sites functioned as central hubs (degree = 19-23; eigenvector centrality = 0.90-1.0), integrating nematode-bacteria associations. Key connector taxa included Acrobeloides, Wilsonema and Aphelenchoides, as well as bacteria such as Rhizobiales and Acidothermus. These findings provide a baseline framework for understanding belowground biodiversity and co-occurrence patterns in Eucalyptus plantation soils.

Research topics

  • Nematode management and characterization studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.70341

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.