article · Obesities
Sociodemographic factors affect how metabolic syndrome (MetS) manifests and progresses. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence between MetS and sociodemographic factors among adult participants in the Dikgale HDSS. This was a comprehensive retrospective study where the records of 575 participants were meticulously evaluated. MetS was defined using a joint interim statement (JIS). The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for SPSS, version 25. A chi-square test was used to compare proportions between groups, with Cramer’s V used to assess the strength of association. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between MetS and sociodemographic profiles. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The prevalence of MetS was 28.2% (females 33.3% vs. males 15.6%, p ≤ 0.001). In addition, logistic regression showed males to have lower odds of MetS as compared to females (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.2–0.6, and AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.6). The 55–60 age group had the highest proportion of affected individuals, and MetS was also more common among individuals with low educational attainment. In addition, on regression, the same association was observed. This study found sociodemographic disparities in MetS among rural adults, especially females, who had an increased risk of MetS, and participants with low educational attainment.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/obesities4040038
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.