article · Asian Journal of Medicine and Health
Background: Menstrual hygiene behaviour is crucial for women's reproductive health, yet evidence on its predictors among female undergraduates in Southern Nigeria is limited. This study assessed socio-demographic factors influencing menstrual hygiene behaviour among female medical undergraduate students at Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional design was used, with data collected from 312 female medical undergraduates selected via stratified random sampling. A validated Menstrual Practices Questionnaire was used, and data were analysed with SPSS Version 27. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and multivariable ordinal logistic regression were performed. Model diagnostics included normality testing, multicollinearity assessment, and tests of proportional odds, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of participants was 21.4 ± 2.3 years. Menstrual hygiene behaviour was categorised as poor (17.6%), fair (29.5%), and good (52.9%). Significant bivariate associations were found with age group (χ²=9.84, p=0.007), academic level (χ²=6.22, p=0.045), mother's education (χ²=11.32, p=0.003), and monthly allowance (χ²=10.05, p=0.006). Ordinal logistic regression identified that students aged 20–24 had higher odds of better hygiene behaviour (AOR=1.82, 95% CI: 1.12–2.96) compared to younger peers. Senior academic level (AOR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.03–2.46), higher maternal education (AOR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.37–3.35), and moderate/high allowance (AOR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.22–3.05) were also significant predictors. Urban residence was not significant after adjustment (p=0.392). Conclusion: Age, academic progression, maternal education, and financial capacity are significant socio-demographic predictors of menstrual hygiene behaviour among female medical undergraduates. Interventions should address these structural determinants alongside educational components to improve menstrual health outcomes in tertiary institutions.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.9734/ajmah/2026/v24i31364
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.