MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Smart weather aware drone sink SWADS for reliable and energy efficient agricultural wireless sensor networks

2025Open accessSuez University

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) for precision agriculture are constrained by limited node energy, weather-induced link variability, and latency requirements. This work introduces SWADS, a clustered WSN architecture in which an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) serves as a mobile sink and cooperates with two intelligence layers: (i) a long short-term memory (LSTM) forecaster for short-horizon weather prediction that triggers proactive UAV/fixed-sink handover during adverse conditions, and (ii) a reinforcement-learning (RL) policy for energy-aware cluster-head (CH) selection. In MATLAB simulations with 200 nodes over 8,000 rounds (first-order radio model, AWGN channel), the LSTM achieves ≈ 96% validation accuracy (> 97% training), enabling timely handovers that avoid predicted fades, while the RL policy selects near-optimal CHs with ≈ 95% accuracy, mitigating energy hotspots. SWADS sustains operation from first-node death (FND) at ~ 5,760 rounds to last-node death (LND) at ~ 7,032 rounds, demonstrating extended lifetime under clustered, mobility-aware routing. End-to-end delay remains low at ~ 1-1.2 ms on average, and packet loss is limited to ~ 6.04% despite channel noise, reflecting reduced contention via aggregation and shortened sink-CH distances. Throughput remains stable up to ~ 7,000 rounds with a peak of ~ 160 packets/round. Across baselines (static-sink LEACH-style, UAV mobile sink without weather awareness, and RL-based clustering without mobility), SWADS consistently delivers longer lifetime, lower delay, and more stable throughput. These results indicate that coupling weather-aware sink mobility with RL-driven clustering provides a robust and energy-efficient path to practical, long-lived agricultural WSN deployments.

Research topics

  • UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-31821-5

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.