MARATTO

article · Journal of Glaucoma

Slow-Coagulation Cyclophotocoagulation versus Conventional Continuous Wave Cyclophotocoagulation and Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation for the Treatment of Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

SC-TSCPC may provide comparable IOP control to CW-TSCPC and appears more effective than MP-TSCPC in lowering IOP, with a similar safety profile. It may represent a viable non-incisional treatment option for glaucoma, including patients who retain visual potential. These results require cautious interpretation due to the overall low-to-very low quality of evidence and significant heterogeneity among studies. Larger randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.

Research topics

  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and Macular Surgery

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000002710

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.