article · Babcock University Medical Journal
Objective: There is a lack of research on how sleep quality affects the mental well-being of healthcare workers, prompting this study. This study aims to explore the relationship between sleep quality and mental well-being among Babcock University Teaching Hospital healthcare workers. Method: This study was done among the healthcare workers of Babcock University Teaching Hospital. It was a cross-sectional study done via a multi-stage sampling technique. A total of 246 valid responses were analysed. Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and mental well-being was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-12. The data was presented in tables, percentages, and frequencies, while association was analysed using chi-square. Results: The findings revealed that 69.5% of healthcare workers had poor sleep quality (mean PSQI score = 6.28 ± 5.612). Additionally, 48.4% of respondents experienced mental distress. Despite these high levels of poor sleep and mental distress, no statistically significant association was found between sleep quality and mental well-being (χ²= 0.126, p=0.723). Conclusion: The study revealed a high prevalence of poor sleep quality and considerable mental distress among healthcare workers, underscoring the growing concern for their overall well-being. Although no statistically significant association was found between sleep quality and mental well-being, the elevated proportions observed suggest that both domains warrant independent attention. Interventions aimed at improving sleep hygiene and promoting psychological support within healthcare settings remain essential to enhance workforce health and performance.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v9i1.1176
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.