MARATTO

article · Results in Engineering

Simulation-based multi-objective genetic optimization for promoting energy efficiency and thermal comfort in existing buildings of hot climate

202448 citationsOpen accessAssiut University

In plain language

Energy consumption in residential buildings can be substantially lowered through targeted retrofit interventions. Using a calibrated energy model of a two-storey residential building in the United Arab Emirates, the research evaluated six retrofit variables: wall insulation, roof insulation, glazing, air infiltration rates, window shading, and indoor cooling temperature setpoints. Parametric and sensitivity assessments established that wall insulation and cooling setpoints exert the greatest influence on overall building energy demand. Improved wall insulation achieved a 38.8 percent reduction, while cooling setpoint adjustments yielded a 25.7 percent decrease. By applying a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), the evaluation generated 106 Pareto optimal configurations. These solutions achieved average annual energy savings of 60 percent, corresponding to between 10,942 and 20,250 kilowatt-hours per year, whilst maintaining low annual thermal discomfort durations between 296 and 1,230 hours.

Key takeaways

  • Upgrading wall insulation to a U-value of 0.14 W/m2K reduces annual residential energy consumption by 38.8 percent.
  • Optimising cooling setpoint temperatures delivers a 25.7 percent reduction in building energy use.
  • Wall insulation and cooling setpoints represent the two most influential variables affecting residential energy demand.
  • Multi-objective genetic optimisation identified 106 balanced solutions delivering average annual energy reductions of 60 percent alongside controlled thermal discomfort.

Why it matters

Cooling buildings in hot climates requires immense amounts of electrical power, driving up utility bills and carbon emissions. This research illustrates how existing residential properties can be retrofitted effectively without compromising occupant comfort. By identifying which physical upgrades and operational settings deliver the highest energy reductions, decision-makers can prioritise investments that yield the greatest efficiency gains and lower running costs.

Commercialisation angle

The findings can guide retrofit contractors, building energy auditors, and municipal planners seeking to prioritise renovation measures for residential housing stock in arid regions. Because the results derive from simulation-based modelling on a single calibrated structure, the work sits at an applied, pre-commercial research stage. Transitioning to broader deployment requires validating the optimised retrofit packages across physical field trials and developing standardised decision-support toolkits for real estate developers.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

This study conducts a detailed analysis to improve to enhance the energy performance of residential buildings in UAE through various retrofit measures. The applied methodology involved developing a calibrated building energy model for a two-story residential building, followed by a parametric analysis of six design variables, including wall and roof insulation, glazing, infiltration rate, window shading, and setpoint and setback temperatures to evaluate their impact on annual energy consumption. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the importance of the investigated design variables on building energy use. An optimization approach using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) was then implemented to optimize energy consumption while minimizing discomfort conditions. The key findings from the parametric simulations show significant energy savings: a 38.8 % reduction from improved wall insulation (achieving a U-value of 0.14 W/m2K), a 2.3 % decrease with better roof insulation, a 9.8 % saving from using triple clear glass glazing, a 9.6 % reduction by lowering the infiltration rate to 2.5 m³/h.m2, 7.5 % savings from window shading, and a 25.7 % decrease by optimizing cooling setpoints. A sensitivity analysis highlighted the dominant impact of wall insulation and cooling setpoint temperatures on energy usage. Followed by the cooling setpoint temperature. The subsequent NSGA-II optimization yielded 106 Pareto optimal solutions from 1897 iterations, offering a balance between reducing energy consumption (10,942 to 20,250 kWh/year, averaging 60 % savings) and minimizing discomfort hours (296–1230 h). These results provide actionable insights for stakeholders in the retrofitting process, emphasizing the significant energy-saving potential of specific retrofit measures.

Research topics

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101815

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.