article
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become integrated into our lives more than ever. However, AI systems do not come without drawbacks. Over recent years, these systems have demonstrated embedded discrimination and bias, which have shaken public trust in these systems. To address these risks, auditing AI systems has emerged as a core process to regain stakeholder trust by identifying AI risks and planning mitigation strategies to address them. Despite its promising impact, this field is still immature, lacks standards and well-defined practices, and practitioners often face substantial challenges in anticipating, detecting, and mitigating harms. To address these challenges, the article highlights the importance of AI systems’ auditability and the major role internal auditing plays in enhancing this auditability. We then present an innovative framework aimed at improving the auditability of AI systems through the process of internal auditing. The proposed framework is intended to serve as an auditability enhancer and enabler to address AI harms before they propagate to the end user.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/iraset68627.2026.11538661
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.