article · Construction and Building Materials
This study investigates the shear performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with Near-Surface Mounted Aluminum Tubes (NSM-ATs) through experimental and numerical analyses. Nine RC beams were tested under a three-point loading setup to evaluate the effects of key parameters, including the number of NSM-ATs (four or five), spacing (150 mm or 106 mm), the presence of mechanical expansion anchors (MEAs), and strip inclination angles (60°, 45°, or 30°). The experimental results demonstrated that the anchorage system significantly enhanced shear capacity by improving bond strength and delaying crack initiation. The most effective configuration—five anchored vertical NSM-ATs—increased the cracking load by 92 %, ultimate load capacity by 64 %, elastic stiffness by 200 %, and energy absorption by 223 % compared to the defective beam, even matching the performance of the fully reinforced control beam. Inclined NSM-ATs also improved shear resistance, with the 45° orientation yielding the highest ultimate load. A nonlinear 3D finite element model (FEM) was developed using ABAQUS and validated against experimental data, showing strong agreement in load-deflection behavior and failure modes. The findings highlight the effectiveness of NSM-ATs, particularly when combined with anchorage, as a reliable technique for shear strengthening in RC beams, offering improved ductility and load-bearing capacity for retrofitting applications. • Near-Surface Mounted Aluminum Tubes (NSM-ATs) enhance RC beam shear strength. • Five anchored vertical NSM-ATs (106 mm wide) significantly improved cracking load, shear capacity, stiffness, and energy absorption. • The anchorage system delayed crack formation and reduced propagation, enhancing ductility. • ABAQUS-based 3D finite element modeling confirmed experimental results. • This technique offers a cost-effective, durable, and eco-friendly approach for RC beam strengthening.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142604
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.