MARATTO

article · PLoS ONE

Sex differences in the risk profiles for anemia in people living with HIV, A cross sectional study

20253 citationsOpen accessUniversity Teaching Hospital

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia in people living with HIV (PLWH) significantly impacts quality of life and health outcomes. This study aimed to determine sex differences in factors associated with anemia in PLWH at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital, Zambia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 631 PLWH aged 18 years or older who had been on combinational ART for at least 6 months. Data was collected via standardized questionnaires and medical records. Anemia was defined as haemoglobin levels < 13 g/dL for men and < 12 g/dL for women, based on WHO criteria. Logistic regression models assessed the associated factors, stratified by sex. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 44 years, with a female preponderance of 64.2%. The overall prevalence of anemia was 36%, significantly higher in females (41.1%) compared to males (27.2%) (p < 0.001). In females, waist circumference (AOR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99, P = 0.018), albumin levels (AOR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.047), NNRTI regimens (AOR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.34-5.78, P = 0.006), microcytosis (AOR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.26-8.03, P = 0.014), and hypertension (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.87, P = 0.024) were linked to anemia in adjusted analysis but these associations were abrogated by male sex. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 36% prevalence of anemia among PLWH, with a higher prevalence in females (41%) compared to males (27%), including severe forms of anemia. Among females, anemia was linked to lower waist circumference, lower albumin levels, NNRTI regimens, microcytosis, and blood pressure but not males. Further studies are warranted.

Research topics

  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319611

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.