book chapter
The objective of this chapter isto investigatethe benefit of the rapid antigenic detection of SARS-CoV-2 and to demonstrate the contribution of this technique compared to real-time RT-PCR. In this study, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid N antigen rapid diagnostic test (Standard Covid-19 Ag Test, SD Biosensor) was performed. The sample size of the study was49 patients. Real-time RT-PCR testing was performed only in 12 patients. Extraction kit (Model: VDR-B096V) was used for the extraction of nucleic acids from various cell types. The extracted nucleic acids are applicable to PCR, real-time PCR, enzymatic reactions and others. Nasopharayngeal swabs were taken from subjects whose mean age was 35 years (range 23-68 years) and who presented one of the following symptoms: dry cough (30.61%), chest tightness (28%), fever (28%), headache (24.48%), asthenia (22.44%) and diarrhea in only 14.28%. The time between the onset of symptoms and the completion of the test ranged from 0 to 2 days. In the chosen sample14 (28.57%) were positive and 35 (71.42%) were negative for all rapid tests performed. Of the samples tested, 44 came from different IMKO departments. RT-PCR was performed in 8 patients whose rapid tests were negative and gave a positive result in 2 cases. Considering the significance of the global public health emergency during the pandemic, it was necessary to carry out large studies to better understand the issue of potential SARS-CoV-2 recurrence in COVID-19 patients. Due to the limited proportion of patients with prolonged SARS-Cov-2 RNA conversion and the high false negative rate of viral test results, recurrence of positive SARS-Cov-2 may experience from false negative RT-PCR results. SARS-Cov-2 reactivation or re-infection will be a persistent and vexing problem. It has been observed that the detection of SARS-CoV-2 needs to be evaluated and compared to the standard RT-PCR technique, which often offers significantly better sensitivity.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.9734/bpi/acmmr/v8/5841c
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.