MARATTO

article · IEEE Access

SEMAR: A Multi-Task Term Weighting Approach for Sentiment and Emotion-Based E-Learning Users’ Satisfaction Analysis

Abstract

The proliferation of Information Technology (IT) has significantly accelerated the deployment of numerous services in different fields, including education. Assessing e-learning lecturers’ and students’ satisfaction has become essential for improving the quality of teaching and learning processes. Most of the previous approaches have introduced several feature weighting models that represent sentiment or emotion analysis by combining Word2Vec with TF-IDF or TF-IWF. However, these models do not consider two important features: Word Frequency (WF) and Document Frequency (DF) and fail to address varying levels of users’ satisfaction. Additionally, integrating sentiment and emotion information from extracted opinions in e-learning systems has received limited attention and still requires further improvement. To overcome these limitations, this study presents Sentiment and Emotion Multi-task Analysis Recognition (SEMAR), a new multi-task term-weighting strategy that departs from conventional embedding fusion. SEMAR assigns multiple, context-aware weights to every term and integrates TF-Density, Word2Vec, EWE, and fastText in a dual CNN–BiLSTM architecture, enabling joint capture of statistical, semantic, and affective patterns. Extensive experiments on six heterogeneous datasets show that SEMAR consistently delivers significant performance gains, achieving an average F1-score of 92.82 % and surpassing all baselines by a large margin. These findings indicate that employing multi-task term weighting together with a dual-branch deep learning architecture provides a substantial step forward for analyzing sentiment- and emotion-driven e-learning satisfaction, rather than simply merging pre-existing methods.

Research topics

  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2025.3627657

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.