MARATTO

article · Applied Sciences

Sea-State-Conditioned Motion Response of Berthed Ships Using Field Measurements from Multiple Vessels and Berths

Abstract

Field measurements of ship motions at berth are often sparse, heterogeneous, and collected across multiple vessels and locations, limiting the applicability of conventional response-modelling approaches. This study presents a statistical framework for analysing sea-state-conditioned motion responses using long-term monitoring data with incomplete overlap between degrees of freedom (DoF). Each DoF is analysed independently and conditioned on significant wave height (Hs) and peak wave period (Tp), with directional values retained across the full angular range (0–360°) and examined separately. A two-stage quality-control procedure combining plausibility checks and robust regression removes inconsistent response–sea-state pairs while preserving dominant behaviour. Motion response envelopes are derived by binning observations in sea-state space and computing median and upper-percentile statistics. To quantify sampling uncertainty, bootstrap resampling provides 95% confidence intervals for envelopes and derived metrics, ensuring robust comparative conclusions. Results show systematic growth in motion variability with increasing Hs, with surge exhibiting the strongest translational sensitivity and roll the largest amplification. Synthetic sea surfaces generated using a spectral random-phase approach reproduce prescribed sea-state characteristics, supporting physical interpretation. The study contributes a data-driven framework for heterogeneous berth datasets, robust quality control, uncertainty-aware response envelopes, and statistically consistent synthetic seas, aligning field-based monitoring with practical port operability assessment.

Research topics

  • Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Wave and Wind Energy Systems

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/app16104640

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.