article · medRxiv
Abstract Early detection of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) is essential in reducing its associated mortality and late complications. In resource-limited settings, automated detection using low-cost electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors can enhance prevention efforts. However, its effectiveness as a potential RHD screening tool in at-risk populations remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the utility of machine learning for classifying RHD in a cohort screened for RHD using low-cost ECG devices. The ECGs were collected from 611 at-risk schoolchildren using KardiaMobile, where 47 were confirmed RHD and 564 were healthy. First, the ECG fiducial points were annotated using a publicly available prominence-based delineator. Then, temporal, frequency, wavelet, and visibility graph-based features were extracted from six-leads and fed to the XGBoost classifier. A 10-fold cross-validation was used at different prediction score thresholds to obtain target sensitivity (Se) for screening RHD. Single-lead evaluation on Lead-II showed an F1-score of 60.9%, a Se of 59.6% and a positive-predictive-value (PPV) of 62.2%. However, using multiple leads improved the results, with an F1-score of 62.8%, a Se of 59.6% and a PPV of 66.7%. The best model performance was achieved by adjusting the threshold to 0.6 with Se and PPV of 66% and 51%, respectively. Error analysis revealed that T-wave and STT changes, as well as non-rheumatic mitral valve cases were among the false positive cases. Machine learning can enhance early detection by leveraging relevant ECG features and adjustable target sensitivity based on screening priorities and resource capacity. Measurements can be obtained without chest contact, using only the fingers and knees, thereby enabling use by non-clinical staff. This approach provides a scalable and cost-effective solution for RHD screening in high-prevalence regions.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.64898/2026.05.03.26352326
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.