article · Global Security Health Science and Policy
Policy shifts in US foreign aid under the Trump administration have had far-reaching consequences for global health, particularly on the African continent. The withdrawal from the World Health Organization and the suspension of foreign aid have significantly disrupted US global health initiatives. While programmes such as PEPFAR have retained some support, the shutdown on USAID operations – a critical agency for health and disease response across 47 sub-Saharan African countries – poses substantial challenges. These cutbacks not only threaten public health efforts but also diminish strategic investment opportunities, given Africa’s rapidly growing economies and potential for high economic returns. Furthermore, reducing aid endangers healthcare and biomedical innovations that have been instrumental in combating diseases such as Ebola and HIV. In the past, US-funded initiatives have contributed to Africa’s pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity and technological advancements, fostering mutual economic benefits. The shift in foreign aid policy risks weakening US global influence, creating a vacuum that geopolitical competitors, such as China and Russia, are poised to exploit. In this paper, we argue that sustained investment in African health initiatives is essential for strengthening economic partnerships, enhancing global health security, and reinforcing US geopolitical standing.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/23779497.2025.2529165
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.