MARATTO

article · Functional Ecology

Savanna tree species show contrasting acclimation responses to elevated atmospheric <scp> CO <sub>2</sub> </scp> concentration and drought

2025Open accessRhodes University

Abstract

Abstract Woody plant expansion into historically grass‐dominated savannas is reshaping ecosystem structure and function, with consequences for biodiversity, nutrient cycling and land use. This shift is thought to be driven by the physiological responses of certain C 3 tree species to elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations (eCO 2 ), modulated by water availability, among other constraints. However, the species‐specific mechanisms regulating photosynthetic acclimation under these conditions remain unclear. Using an Open‐Top Chamber system, we examined the responses of five southern African C 3 tree seedlings to ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (550 ppm) CO 2 concentrations under contrasting soil water availability. Our results revealed that Vachellia karroo , V. tortilis and V. sieberiana exhibited clear photosynthetic upregulation under eCO 2 , with increased photosynthetic capacity (carboxylation capacity and/or electron transport rate), particularly under well‐watered conditions when stomatal conductance was highest. These responses diminished under water limitation but remained higher than in V. robusta and Senegalia burkei , which downregulated under eCO 2 at high water availability and showed only modest improvements under dry conditions. Importantly, photosynthetic upregulation did not consistently translate into above‐ground growth gains, with significant enhancement observed only in V. sieberiana under high water supply. These divergent acclimation strategies highlight why some species emerge as dominant encroachers under rising CO 2 , while others remain constrained by stronger physiological limitations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Research topics

  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.70201

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.