article · Neural Computing and Applications
Abstract Accurate human counting in indoor environments is essential for optimizing people-centric applications, such as crowd management, disaster response, and monitoring in settings like shopping malls and healthcare facilities. Traditional vision approaches face challenges with poor lighting conditions and raise privacy concerns. WiFi-based solutions enable device-free human counting by detecting disruptions in wireless signals caused by human presence. However, methods using received signal strength indicator are unreliable due to physical obstructions, multipath fading, radio interference, and fluctuating access point power. While WiFi channel state information-based systems are more sensitive to environmental changes, they lack standardization, limiting their practicality. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents Time4Count, an innovative device-free indoor human counting system that leverages round trip time measurements to achieve high accuracy and scalability. Time4Count capitalizes on human-induced fluctuations in signal propagation time to accurately estimate the number of individuals in a space. By employing a multivariate transformer-based feature extraction method, the system effectively mitigates non-line-of-sight errors and signal distortions, ensuring robust performance even in cluttered indoor environments. Additionally, Time4Count integrates spatial discretization and multi-label classification techniques, enabling it to count an unlimited number of individuals in real-time. The system was rigorously evaluated in two realistic, cluttered environments using commodity hardware, involving up to 15 participants. Experimental results reveal that Time4Count achieves an high counting accuracy of 92.7%. To our knowledge, Time4Count is the first RTT-based indoor counting system, providing a precise solution for indoor monitoring. Implementation is available at: https://github.com/mclab-osaka/time4count .
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-025-11540-8
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.