MARATTO

article · Zagazig University Medical Journal

Role of Dynamic Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Abstract

Background: The advantage of ultrasound (US) and capability of dynamic evaluation can ‎improve the accuracy of US diagnoses of shoulder pain, especially when the cause is not ‎immediately apparent during a routine evaluation. The current research aimed to evaluate the ‎role of dynamic ultrasound as a non-invasive modality in diagnosis of shoulder impingement ‎syndrome in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.‎Methods: Thirty-six patients with a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement were ‎involved in this cross-sectional study that conducted at Radiodiagnosis Department of Zagazig ‎University Hospital. Static and dynamic ultrasonography were performed to all cases in ‎addition to conventional MRI examination.‎Results: Our results revealed that ultrasound had 100% sensitivity and specificity in detecting ‎supraspinatus tear when compared to conventional MRI. Also, ultrasound showed 100% ‎sensitivity and 86.7% specificity in detection of calcification in supraspinatus muscle when ‎compared to MRI. Ultrasound had 100% specificity and 80% sensitivity in detection of ‎infraspinatus tendenopathic changes. Also, ultrasound had 100% specificity and 87.5% ‎sensitivity in detection of tendenopathic changes in subscapularis tendon. Ultrasound shows ‎‎100% sensitivity and specificity in detecting biceps tenosynovitis and acromioclavicular joint ‎osteoarthritis when compared to conventional MRI. A statistically significant reduction of the ‎sub-acromial tunnel during active shoulder movement was found with mean difference 0.42 (P ‎‎<0.001).‎Conclusion: For evaluating the shoulder impingement as well as the rotator cuff disorders, ‎ultrasound was found to be comparable to MRI. ‎

Research topics

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.252063.3104

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.