MARATTO

article · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Role of cervical fascia flap in reducing the incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy

2026Open accessMansoura University

Abstract

The aim of the current randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the superiorly based cervical fascia flap in reducing the incidence of the PCF after total laryngectomy. Additionally, the functional outcomes in terms of postoperative swallowing functions were evaluated. This parallel randomized clinical trial included 50 patients undergoing total laryngectomy, randomly assigned to either a cervical fascia flap group (n = 25) or a control group (n = 25). In the cervical fascia group, a superiorly based flap from the investing layer of the deep cervical fascia was used to reinforce the pharyngeal closure. The primary outcome was the incidence of PCF. Secondary outcomes included postoperative swallowing function assessed three months postoperatively using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study. PCF occurred in 2 patients (8%) in the cervical fascia group compared with 8 patients (32%) in the control group, demonstrating a statistically significant reduction (p = 0.034). Swallowing outcomes were significantly better in the cervical fascia group, with lower median EAT-10 scores (p = 0.001) and more favorable videofluoroscopic findings (p = 0.039). The use of cervical fascia for pharyngeal repair after total laryngectomy is effective in reducing the incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula. Its main advantages include technical simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and availability within the same surgical field, without the need for additional incisions, prolonged operative time, or donor-site morbidity. Furthermore, this technique is associated with favorable postoperative swallowing outcomes.

Research topics

  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Voice and Speech Disorders

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s00405-026-10179-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.