MARATTO

article · Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics

Role of Bluff Body Configuration in Modifying Turbulent Flow in Sudden Expansions

2026Open accessMenoufia University

Abstract

This study combines experimental and numerical approaches to investigate flow behavior downstream of bluff bodies placed at the mid-span of a rectangular sudden expansion configurations common in combustion chambers, burners, flame stabilizers, and chemical mixers. The three-dimensional, steady, incompressible, and turbulent flow was analyzed for varying Reynolds numbers, bluff body shapes (square, diamond, circular, triangular-arrow-left and arrow-right), sizes, and streamwise positions. Introducing a bluff body significantly modified flow field, intensifying adverse pressure gradients and delaying reattachment compared with configuration without a bluff body. The pressure recovery coefficient strongly depended on geometry; at Re = 74,200, the diamond body achieved a value 179% higher than that of the triangle–arrow-left configuration. Increasing bluff body size consistently reduced pressure recovery and increased losses, for instance, enlarging a cylindrical body by 2.2 times at Re = 93,734 increased the upper-wall pressure drop by 240%. Numerical simulations, validated against experiments with less than 2% deviation, revealed multiple recirculation zones and complex wake vortices that expanded with Reynolds number. Flow asymmetry occasionally appeared due to combined effects of geometry, size, and position. Drag increased with Reynolds number, with the triangle–arrow-right body producing the highest drag. Overall, the results demonstrate a strong dependence of sudden-expansion flow characteristics on bluff body parameters, providing valuable insights for optimizing engineering systems involving flow control and pressure recovery.

Research topics

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.47176/jafm.19.4.3971

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.