MARATTO

article · Mycology&#58 An International Journal on Fungal Biology

Riverine mycobiome dynamics: From South African tributaries to laboratory bioreactors

20243 citationsOpen accessStellenbosch University

Abstract

Riverine fungi have the capacity for both pathogenicity, pertinent for countries with elevated immunosuppressed individuals, and bioremediation potential. The purpose was (i) to screen for the presence of clinically relevant riverine fungi and associations with anthropogenic influence, and (ii) the acclimatisation of environmental communities toward potential bioremediation application. Communities were harvested from polluted rivers in Stellenbosch, South Africa, and mycobiomes characterised by high-throughput amplicon sequencing. The remainder of the biomass was inoculated into continuous bioreactors with filtered river water or sterile minimal medium. Seven weeks later, the mycobiomes were re-sequenced. At least nine clinically relevant species were detected, including agents of mycoses belonging to the genus <i>Candida</i>. The occurrence of genera that harbour opportunisticstrains was significantly higher (<i>P</i> = 0.04) at more polluted sites. Moreover, positive correlations occured between some genera and pollution indices, demonstrating the potential of fungi for addition to water quality indicators. Despite biomass increase, almost all pathogens were undetectable after seven weeks, demonstrating less resilience in conditions mimicking rivers. Thus, when screening riverine biomes for bioremediation potential, ambient reactors select against human pathogens. This indicates a transient introduction of allochthonous opportunistic species into rivers due to insufficient sanitation, and the potential of bioremediation strategies that selects for environmental rather than pathogenic traits.

Research topics

  • Plant and fungal interactions
  • Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Gut microbiota and health

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/21501203.2023.2278309

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.