MARATTO

preprint

Risk factors for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss among Women seeking care at a tertiary private-not-for-profit hospital in Northern Uganda: A Case-Control Study

2024Open accessGulu University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background:</bold>Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) imposes a substantial burden, but data from sub-Saharan Africa are limited. We aimed to determine risk factors for RPL at a tertiary private-not-profit hospital in Northern Uganda.<bold>Methods:</bold>We conducted an unmatched case-control study among pregnant women at a referral hospital in Northern Uganda from February to June 2023. Cases included women aged 15-49 with ≥2 miscarriages and pregnancy &lt;28 weeks of gestation. The controls were pregnant women with no history of miscarriage. We used a structured questionnaire to collect data and multivariable logistic regression for analysis.<bold>Results:</bold>We included 56 participants (19 cases and 37 controls), the median age was 29 years (IQR 26-35). The major factor associated with RPL was single/divorced status (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 8.2, 95%CI 1.15-58.27). There was no statistical evidence of association between pregnancy planning (aOR: 2.5, 95% CI: 0.62-9.88, p=0.197) or chronic medical illness (aOR: 4.7, 95% CI: 0.91-24.42, p=0.065) and RPL<bold>Conclusions:</bold>This small, single-centre study found an association between single/divorced marital status and RPL risk. However, wide confidence intervals warrant cautious interpretation. Small sample size and retrospective design limit conclusiveness but provide a basis for larger multi-centre studies on independent risk factors for RPL including chronic illnesses, uterine anomalies, and gynaecological procedures.

Research topics

  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3779245/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.