article · Agriculture
This study assessed the impact of paper mill effluent and Kali River water used for irrigation on soil properties, two rice varieties (PB-1121 and PR-121), and potential human health risks. Researchers collected samples near Saharanpur, India, analysing physicochemical and heavy metal parameters. Both paper mill effluent and Kali River water contained significant pollutants that negatively affected soil. However, rice irrigated with Kali River water generally showed better growth and yield compared to effluent or borewell water. Heavy metals accumulated in rice straw and grain, with iron, manganese, and zinc being most prevalent. While most rice samples posed no health risk, the PR-121 variety irrigated with Kali River water presented a potential health risk.
This research is important because it highlights the dangers of using untreated industrial wastewater for crop irrigation, particularly in regions where this practice is common. Understanding how heavy metals accumulate in staple foods like rice and assessing the associated health risks is crucial for ensuring food safety and protecting public health.
The abstract does not indicate a direct application pathway for commercialisation. However, the findings provide valuable data for policymakers and agricultural organisations to develop guidelines for safe irrigation practices and monitor heavy metal contamination in food crops. This information could also support risk assessment models for food safety.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Heavy metal pollution from industrial wastewaters has become an issue of global concern. These wastewaters are frequently used for inland irrigation which possess a serious risk of heavy metal contamination of both soil and cultivated crops. The problem is more common in developing countries like India where industrial wastewaters are often discharged without appropriate treatments. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing the impact of paper mill effluent for irrigation on the growth, productivity, and heavy metal accumulation potential of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties (PB-1121 and PR-121). Water, soil, and rice crop samples were obtained from the vicinity of Saharanpur city, Uttar Pradesh, India, and subsequently analyzed for selected physicochemical and heavy metal parameters. Results showed that paper mill effluent and nearby Kali River water had significant (p < 0.05) loads of pollutants that impacted the soil properties. Moreover, the maximum plant height (123.48 ± 4.86 and 98.83 ± 2.02 cm); total chlorophyll (6.70 ± 0.25 and 6.64 ± 0.17 mg/g); leaf carotenoids (0.67 ± 0.08 and 0.63 ± 0.05 mg/g); starch content (71.08 ± 2.05 and 72.60 ± 1.63%); amylose content (25.10 ± 1.32 and 20.28 ± 1.24%); crop yield (4270.20 ± 75.12 and 5830.58 ± 63.10 kg/ha); and straw yield (5472.05 ± 93.90 and 6683.76 ± 61.26 kg/ha) of PB-1121 and PR-121, respectively, were observed using Kali River water irrigation source as compared to paper mill effluent and borewell water. The order of heavy metal accumulation in rice straw and grain followed: Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Cd. Similarly, the bioaccumulation factors for heavy metals in rice straw and grain were observed as >1 and <1, respectively. Moreover, the target hazard quotient (THQ) showed that there was no potential health risk of heavy metal in rice irrigated with contaminated water supply except for the PR-121 variety irrigated with Kali River water where the health risk index (HRI) value exceeded the limit (>1). As a result, the findings of this study provide useful information about the current state of heavy metal pollution and the health risks associated with rice crops irrigated with contaminated water sources.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12111864
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
